When we receive a SIP reinvite, it is possible that we may not be able to process the
reinvite immediately since we have also sent a reinvite out ourselves. The problem is
that whoever sent us the reinvite may have also sent a reinvite out to another party,
and that reinvite may have succeeded.
As a result, even though we are not going to accept the reinvite we just received, it
is important for us to not have problems if we suddenly start receiving RTP from a new
source. The fix for this is to grab the media source information from the SDP of the
reinvite that we receive. This information is passed to the RTP layer so that it will
know about the alternate source for media.
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/252
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@197588 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
If we already have an address for a peer, and we are reloading the sip
configuration, try to use that address to contact the peer, instead of
getting it from the Contact.
(closes issue #15194)
Reported by: ibc
Patches:
sip.patch uploaded by eliel (license 64)
Tested by: manwe
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@197562 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
The presence of rport is now stored as a separate flag. Once the dialog is setup and authenticated
(or it passes through unauthenticated) the proper nat flag is set.
(closes issue #13823)
Reported by: dimas
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@197466 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
There are rare cases in which a frame's delivery timestamp is slightly less than the iax2_pvt's offset. This causes the pvt's timestamp to be a small negative number, but since the timestamp value is unsigned it looks like a huge positive number. This patch checks for this negative case and sets the ms to zero. A similar check is already done right below this one in the 'else' statement.
(closes issue #15032)
Reported by: guillecabeza
Patches:
chan_iax2.c.patch_timestamp uploaded by guillecabeza (license 380)
Tested by: guillecabeza
(closes issue #14216)
Reported by: Andrey Sofronov
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@195991 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
IAX was not sending REGREJ to terminate invalid registrations. Instead it sent another REGAUTH if the authentication challenge failed. This caused a loop of REGREQ and REGAUTH frames.
(Related to Security fix AST-2009-001)
(closes issue #14867)
Reported by: aragon
Tested by: dvossel
(closes issue #14717)
Reported by: mobeck
Patches:
regauth_loop_update_patch.diff uploaded by dvossel (license 671)
Tested by: dvossel
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@194873 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
There is a bug tracker issue where people are reporting "Ghost" channels in their 'iax2 show channels' output. The confusion is caused by channels being listed as "(NONE)" with format "unknown". These are not channels of coarse. They are usually just pending registration or poke requests, but it is confusing output. To help make sense of this I have added two columns to 'iax2 show channels'. One shows the first message which started the transaction, and the second shows the last message sent by either side of the call. This helps diagnose why the entry exists and why it may not go away.
(closes issue #14207)
Reported by: clive18
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/246/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@194557 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
The loop detection/spiral detection code in chan_sip used the owner
channel's state as a criterion for determining if the incoming INVITE
is a looped request. The problem with this is that the INVITE-handling
code happens in a different thread than the thread that marks the owner
channel as being up. As a result, if a reinvite were to come in very quickly,
say from another Asterisk on the same LAN, it was possible for the reinvite
to arrive before the owner channel had been set to the up state.
This patch corrects the problem by using the invitestate of the sip_pvt
instead, since that can be guaranteed to be set correctly by the time
the reinvite arrives. Since there is a switch statement further in the
INVITE-handling code, the AST_STATE_RINGING state also checks the invitestate
of the sip_pvt in case we should actually be treating the channel as if it were
up already.
(closes issue #12215)
Reported by: jpyle
Patches:
12215_confirmed.patch uploaded by mmichelson (license 60)
Tested by: lmadsen
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@194484 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
The problem was that the hangup code was setting the invitestate too early. The result of
this was that we would always send a CANCEL request, even if it was not an appropriate
time to do so (e.g. we have not yet received a provisional response for our INVITE).
Note that this same fix had been applied to trunk and the 1.6.X branches starting with
revision 155467. This is why you will see this revision being blocked from those places.
AST-216
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@193880 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
In the state MISDN_CALLING (i.e. SETUP was sent but no answer has arrived yet),
it is not allowed to clear the call with RELEASE_COMPLETE. It must be
cleared with DISCONNECT. A RELEASE_COMPLETE is only allowed as an answer
to a SETUP. (See Q.931 ch. 5.3.2, 5.3.2.a, 5.3.2.b)
Patches:
chan-misdn-ccstate7.patch uploaded by customer.
JIRA ABE-1862
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@193613 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
Added the dialed extension and context to the chan_misdn messages warning
that the dialed number cannot be matched in the dialplan.
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@193050 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
If the fullcontact field appears in both the sippeers and the
sipregs table, then during reconstruction of the field, it will
otherwise be doubled.
(closes issue #14754)
Reported by: Alexei Gradinari
Patches:
20090506__bug14754.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14)
Tested by: lmadsen
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@192932 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
mohinterpret and mohsuggest global variables were not copied over during build_users and build_peers.
(closes issue #14728)
Reported by: dimas
Patches:
v1-14728.patch uploaded by dimas (license 88)
Tested by: dimas, dvossel
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@192213 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
If both sides of a Local channel were hung up at around the same time it was
possible for one thread to destroy the local private structure and have the other thread
immediately try to remove the already freed structure from the local channel list.
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@190286 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
Previously, packetization settings were ignored and now they are not. A new
config option 'autoframing' has been added to mirror the way chan_sip handles
it. Turning on the autoframing option (available both as a global option or per
peer) overrides the local settings with the remote packetization settings.
Testing was performed with varying packetization levels with the following
codecs: ulaw, alaw, gsm, and g729.
(closes issue #12415)
Reported by: pj
Patches:
2009012200_h323packetization.diff.txt uploaded by mvanbaak (license 7),
modified by me
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@189991 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
An agent logs in by calling an extension that calls the AgentLogin app. In agents.conf ackcall=always is set, so when they get a call they have the choice to either acknowledge it or ignore it. autologoff=10 is set as well, so if the agent ignores the call over 10sec one may assume that the agent should be logged out (and in this case hungup on as well), but this was not happening.
(closes issue #14091)
Reported by: evandro
Patches:
autologoff.diff uploaded by dvossel (license 671)
Review: http://reviewboard.digium.com/r/225/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@189203 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This commit fixes the scenario where an incoming call is authenticated
using a peer entry. Previously the channel name was created using either
the username setting from the sip.conf entry or the IP address that the
call came from. Now the channel name will be created using the peer name
itself. This commit will not change the way the channel name is generated
for users or friends.
(closes issue #14256)
Reported by: Nick_Lewis
Patches:
chan_sip.c-chname.patch uploaded by Nick (license 657)
Tested by: Nick_Lewis, file
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@188946 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
When the caller ID is restricted, the expected behavior is for the caller id to be blank. In chan_dahdi, the national prefix is placed onto the callers number even if its restricted (empty) causing the caller id to be the national prefix rather than blank.
(closes issue #13207)
Reported by: shawkris
Patches:
national_prefix.diff uploaded by dvossel (license 671)
Review: http://reviewboard.digium.com/r/220/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@188646 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
RFC 5047 explains the proper course of action to take if a
reINVITE is received before the ACK from a previous invite
transaction. What we are to do is to treat the reINVITE as
if it were both an ACK and a reINVITE and process it normally.
Later, when we receive the ACK we had been expecting, we will
ignore it since its CSeq is less than the current iseqno of
the sip_pvt representing this dialog.
(closes issue #13849)
Reported by: klaus3000
Patches:
13849_v2.patch uploaded by mmichelson (license 60)
Tested by: mmichelson, klaus3000
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@187484 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
Don't offer AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR on DAHDI/Zaptel channels... while it could provide a slight performance benefit, the translation core in Asterisk has some flaws when a channel driver offers multiple raw formats. this fix is much simpler than fixing the translation core to solve that issue (although that will be done later).
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@186458 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
Acknowledgement for 491 responses were never being processed because it didn't match our pending invite's seqno. Since the ACK was never processed, the 491 frame would continue to be retransmitted until eventually the call was dropped due to max retries. Now during a pending invite, if we receive another invite, we send an 491 and hold on to that glare invite's seqno in the "glareinvite" variable for that sip_pvt struct. When ACK's are received, we first check to see if it is in response to our pending invite, if not we check to see if it is in response to a glare invite. In this case, it is in response to the glare invite and must be dealt with or the call is dropped. I've changed the wait time for resending the re-Invite after receving a 491 response to comply with RFC 3261. Before this patch the scheduled re-Invite would only change a flag indicating that the re-Invite should be sent out, now it actually sends it out as well.
(closes issue #12013)
Reported by: alx
Review: http://reviewboard.digium.com/r/213/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@185845 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
To drill into the xmpp to find the capabilities between channels, chan_gtalk
calls iks_child() and iks_next(). iks_child() and iks_next() are functions in
the iksemel xml parsing library that traverse xml nodes. The bug here is that
both iks_child() and iks_next() will return the next iks_struct node
*regardless* of type. chan_gtalk expects the next node to be of type IKS_TAG,
which in most cases, it is, but in this case (a call being made from the
Empathy IM client), there exists iks_struct nodes which are not IKS_TAG data
(they are extraneous whitespaces), and chan_gtalk doesn't handle that case,
so capabilities don't match, and a call cannot be made.
iks_first_tag() and iks_next_tag(), on the other hand, will not return the
very next iks_struct, but will check to see if the next iks_struct is of
type IKS_TAG. If it isn't, it will be skipped, and the next struct of type
IKS_TAG it finds will be returned. This assures that chan_gtalk will find
the iks_struct it is looking for.
This fix simply changes all calls to iks_child() and iks_next() to become
calls to iks_first_tag() and iks_next_tag(), which resolves the capability
matching.
The following is a payload listing from Empathy, which, due to the extraneous
whitespace, will not be parsed correctly by iksemel:
<iq from='dbrooksjab@235-22-24-10/Telepathy' to='astjab@235-22-24-10/asterisk' type='set' id='542757715704'> <session xmlns='http://www.google.com/session' initiator='dbrooksjab@235-22-24-10/Telepathy' type='initiate' id='1837267342'> <description xmlns='http://www.google.com/session/phone'> <payload-type clockrate='16000' name='speex' id='96'/>
<payload-type clockrate='8000' name='PCMA' id='8'/>
<payload-type clockrate='8000' name='PCMU' id='0'/>
<payload-type clockrate='90000' name='MPA' id='97'/>
<payload-type clockrate='16000' name='SIREN' id='98'/>
<payload-type clockrate='8000' name='telephone-event' id='99'/>
</description>
</session>
</iq>
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@185362 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
Channel allocation collisions are not handled by chan_misdn very well.
This patch simply avoids the problem for BRI only.
For PRI, allocation collisions are still possible but less likely since
there are simply more channels available and each end could use a different
allocation strategy.
misdn.conf options available:
te_choose_channel - Use to force the TE side to allocate channels.
method - Specify the channel allocation strategy.
(closes issue #13488)
Reported by: Christian_Pinedo
Patches:
isdn_lib.patch.txt uploaded by crich
Tested by: crich, siepkes, festr
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@185120 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
We now answer with matching media streams to what is requested. If an INVITE
is received with both a T38 and RTP media stream this means we answer with both.
For any outgoing calls created as a result of this inbound one no T38 is requested
in the initial INVITE. Instead if we start receiving udptl packets we trigger a
reinvite on the outbound side.
(closes issue #12437)
Reported by: marsosa
Tested by: pinga-fogo, okrief, file, afu
Review: http://reviewboard.digium.com/r/208/
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@184947 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
If calls were placed using an IP address or hostname the global nat setting was copied over
but was not set on the RTP session itself. This caused the RTP stack to not perform symmetric RTP
actions.
(closes issue #14546)
Reported by: acunningham
git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@184565 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
