2006-08-30 03:16:03 +00:00
..
2006-08-22 05:24:50 +00:00
2006-08-22 05:24:50 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-29 20:50:36 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-25 18:05:28 +00:00
2006-08-21 19:18:09 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-29 20:50:36 +00:00
2006-08-22 23:07:11 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-23 20:22:18 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-29 20:50:36 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-26 19:45:16 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-26 23:58:47 +00:00
2006-08-21 19:42:29 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
This change fixes bug 7820. Way back in April this bug was reintroduced, it appears, when a bunch of restructuring was done. This code was basically left out during the restructuring. In the case of the failure in 7820, it is trying to match the extension _x. with _x., and failing, because the 'x' should only match 0 thru 9. I **could** upgrade the code so that that N,Z, and X match not only their intended number ranges, but also N,Z,and X respectively. And, moreover, X could also match N and Z, and Z could also match N. I have no idea why this bug took so long to turn up. I have no idea what a more thorough treatment of the code would do to working code, either. So I left it as it ***was***.
2006-08-29 23:08:42 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-30 03:16:03 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-29 20:50:36 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-29 20:50:36 +00:00
2006-08-21 02:11:39 +00:00
2006-08-25 17:48:34 +00:00