From 1e696d2c935a5e33ee419932ec9a11b92ea93992 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dschreiber Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:13:29 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] FS-3577 : After Tamas's fixes and new logging so we can see the erl_errors, re-applying this 10ms polling interval patch that Tony committed a few months ago. Please report any issues. --- src/mod/event_handlers/mod_erlang_event/mod_erlang_event.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/mod/event_handlers/mod_erlang_event/mod_erlang_event.c b/src/mod/event_handlers/mod_erlang_event/mod_erlang_event.c index 8e78c14c4d..b8e13b2a5c 100644 --- a/src/mod/event_handlers/mod_erlang_event/mod_erlang_event.c +++ b/src/mod/event_handlers/mod_erlang_event/mod_erlang_event.c @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static void listener_main_loop(listener_t *listener) /* do we need the mutex when reading? */ /*switch_mutex_lock(listener->sock_mutex); */ - status = ei_xreceive_msg_tmo(listener->sockfd, &msg, &buf, 100); + status = ei_xreceive_msg_tmo(listener->sockfd, &msg, &buf, 10); /*switch_mutex_unlock(listener->sock_mutex); */ switch (status) {