fix race condition in state thread
This commit is contained in:
parent
31865f0dc4
commit
ee7dd033fd
|
@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(const char *) switch_channel_get_partner_uuid(switch_channel_t *c
|
|||
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_hold_record_t *) switch_channel_get_hold_record(switch_channel_t *channel);
|
||||
SWITCH_DECLARE(void) switch_channel_state_thread_lock(switch_channel_t *channel);
|
||||
SWITCH_DECLARE(void) switch_channel_state_thread_unlock(switch_channel_t *channel);
|
||||
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_state_thread_trylock(switch_channel_t *channel);
|
||||
|
||||
SWITCH_END_EXTERN_C
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2288,6 +2288,13 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(void) switch_channel_state_thread_lock(switch_channel_t *channel)
|
|||
switch_mutex_lock(channel->thread_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_channel_state_thread_trylock(switch_channel_t *channel)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return switch_mutex_trylock(channel->thread_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SWITCH_DECLARE(void) switch_channel_state_thread_unlock(switch_channel_t *channel)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch_mutex_unlock(channel->thread_mutex);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_core_session_dequeue_message(switch_core_
|
|||
|
||||
switch_assert(session != NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (session->message_queue && switch_queue_size(session->message_queue)) {
|
||||
if (session->message_queue) {
|
||||
if ((status = (switch_status_t) switch_queue_trypop(session->message_queue, &pop)) == SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
*message = (switch_core_session_message_t *) pop;
|
||||
if ((*message)->delivery_time && (*message)->delivery_time > switch_epoch_time_now(NULL)) {
|
||||
|
@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_core_session_queue_signal_data(switch_cor
|
|||
switch_assert(session != NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (session->signal_data_queue) {
|
||||
if (switch_queue_trypush(session->signal_data_queue, signal_data) == SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
if (switch_queue_push(session->signal_data_queue, signal_data) == SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
status = SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_core_session_dequeue_signal_data(switch_c
|
|||
|
||||
switch_assert(session != NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (session->signal_data_queue && switch_queue_size(session->signal_data_queue)) {
|
||||
if (session->signal_data_queue) {
|
||||
if ((status = (switch_status_t) switch_queue_trypop(session->signal_data_queue, &pop)) == SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
*signal_data = pop;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1257,14 +1257,33 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_mutex_t *) switch_core_session_get_mutex(switch_core_sessi
|
|||
SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_core_session_wake_session_thread(switch_core_session_t *session)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch_status_t status;
|
||||
int tries = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If trylock fails the signal is already awake so we needn't bother */
|
||||
/* If trylock fails the signal is already awake so we needn't bother ..... or do we????*/
|
||||
|
||||
top:
|
||||
|
||||
status = switch_mutex_trylock(session->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (status == SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
switch_thread_cond_signal(session->cond);
|
||||
switch_mutex_unlock(session->mutex);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (switch_channel_state_thread_trylock(session->channel) == SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||
/* We've beat them for sure, as soon as we release this lock, they will be checking their queue on the next line. */
|
||||
switch_channel_state_thread_unlock(session->channel);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* What luck! The channel has already started going to sleep *after* we checked if we need to wake it up.
|
||||
It will miss any messages in its queue because they were inserted after *it* checked its queue. (catch-22)
|
||||
So, it's not asleep yet, but it's too late for us to be sure they know we want them to stay awake and check its queue again.
|
||||
Now *we* need to sleep instead but just for 1ms so we can circle back and try again.
|
||||
This is so rare (yet possible) to happen that we can be fairly certian it will not happen 2x in a row but we'll try 10x just in case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (++tries < 10) {
|
||||
switch_cond_next();
|
||||
goto top;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return status;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -524,7 +524,16 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(void) switch_core_session_run(switch_core_session_t *session)
|
|||
switch_channel_state_thread_lock(session->channel);
|
||||
switch_channel_set_flag(session->channel, CF_THREAD_SLEEPING);
|
||||
if (switch_channel_get_state(session->channel) == switch_channel_get_running_state(session->channel)) {
|
||||
switch_ivr_parse_all_events(session);
|
||||
switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_SESSION_LOG(session), SWITCH_LOG_DEBUG1, "%s session thread sleep state: %s!\n",
|
||||
switch_channel_get_name(session->channel),
|
||||
switch_channel_state_name(switch_channel_get_running_state(session->channel)));
|
||||
switch_thread_cond_wait(session->cond, session->mutex);
|
||||
switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_SESSION_LOG(session), SWITCH_LOG_DEBUG1, "%s session thread wake state: %s!\n",
|
||||
switch_channel_get_name(session->channel),
|
||||
switch_channel_state_name(switch_channel_get_running_state(session->channel)));
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
switch_channel_clear_flag(session->channel, CF_THREAD_SLEEPING);
|
||||
switch_channel_state_thread_unlock(session->channel);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -851,10 +851,6 @@ SWITCH_DECLARE(switch_status_t) switch_ivr_parse_all_events(switch_core_session_
|
|||
x++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (x) {
|
||||
switch_ivr_sleep(session, 0, SWITCH_TRUE, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue