document why there are so many versions of the mutex functions,

with their pros and cons, and that we should converge to a single method.



git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk@16528 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3
This commit is contained in:
Luigi Rizzo
2006-03-30 16:09:23 +00:00
parent 4ee62f1bcd
commit 6d2fbc0b90

View File

@@ -18,6 +18,33 @@
/*! \file
* \brief General Asterisk channel locking definitions.
*
* This file provides several different implementation of the functions,
* depending on the platform, the use of DEBUG_THREADS, and the way
* global mutexes are initialized.
* At the moment, we have 3 ways to initialize global mutexes, depending on
*
* + static: the mutex is assigned the value AST_MUTEX_INIT_VALUE
* this is done at compile time, and is the way used on Linux.
* This method is not applicable to all platforms e.g. when the
* initialization needs that some code is run.
*
* + on first use: the mutex is assigned a magic value at compile time,
* and ast_mutex_init() is called when this magic value is detected.
* This technique is generally applicable, though it has a bit of
* overhead on each access to check whether initialization is needed.
* On the other hand, the overall cost of a mutex_lock operation
* is such that this overhead is often negligible.
* + through constructors: for each mutex, a constructor function is
* defined, which then runs when the program (or the module)
* starts. The problem with this approach is that there is a
* lot of code duplication (a new block of code is created for
* each mutex). Also, it does not prevent a user from declaring
* a global mutex without going through the wrapper macros,
* so sane programming practices are still required.
*
* Eventually we should converge on a single method for all platforms.
*/
#ifndef _ASTERISK_LOCK_H